Three Receipt Fraud Tests
Today I provide three receipt-fraud tests for auditors.ย
The audit standards require that we introduce elements of unpredictability. Additionally, it’s wise to perform fraud tests. But I find that auditors struggle with brainstorming (required by AU-C 240, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit) and developing fraud tests. That’s why I wrote Five Disbursement Fraud Tests.ย It’s also why I am providing this post.
So, letโs jump in. Here are three receipt-fraud tests.
Three Receipt-Fraud Tests
1. Test adjustments made to receivables
Why test?
Receipt clerks sometimes steal collected monies and write off (or write down) the related receivable. Why does the clerk adjust the receivable? So the customer doesnโt receive a second bill for the funds stolen.ย
How to test?
Obtain a download of receivable adjustments for a period (e.g., two weeks) and see if they were duly authorized. Review the activity with someone outside the receivables area (e.g., CFO) who is familiar with procedures but who has no access to cash collections.
If there are multiple persons with the ability to adjust receivable accounts (quite common in hospitals), compare weekly or monthly adjustments made by each employee.
Agree receipts with bank deposits.
2. Confirm rebate (or similar type) checks
Why test?
When rebate checks are not sent to a central location (e.g., receipting department), the risk of theft increases. Rebate checks are often not recorded as a receivable, so the company may not be aware of the amounts to be received. Stealing unaccrued receivable checks is easy.
How to test?
Determine which vendors provideย rebate checks (or similar non-sales payments). Send confirmations to the vendors and compare the confirmed amounts with activity in the general ledger.
Theft of rebate checks is more common in larger organizations (e.g., hospitals) where checks are sometimes received by various executives. The executive receives a check in the mail and keeps it for a while (in his desk drawer – in case someone asks for it). Once he sees that no one is paying attention, he steals and converts the check to cash.
3. Search for off-the-book thefts of receipts
Why test?
The fraudster may bill for services through the company accounting system or an alternative set of accounting records and personally collect the payments.
How to test?
Compare revenues with prior years and investigate significant variances. Alternatively, start with source documents and walk a sample of transactions to revenue recognition, billing, and collection.
Here are a fewย examples of actual off-the-book thefts:
Police Chief Steals Cash
An auditor detected a decrease in police-fine revenue in a small city while performing audit planning analytics. Upon digging deeper, he discoveredย theย police chiefย had two receipt books, one for checks that wereย appropriately deposited and a second for cash going into his pocket. Sometimes, even Andy Griffith steals.
Hospital CFO Steals Cash
Aย hospital CFO, while performing reorganization procedures, set up a new bank account specifically for deposit of electronic Medicaid remittances. He established himself as the authorized bank account check-signer.
The CFO never set up the bank account in the general ledger. As the Medicaid money was electronically deposited, the CFO transferred the funds to himself.ย ย What was the money used for? A beautiful home on Mobile Bay, new cars, and gambling trips.
Another Receipt Fraud to Consider
Sometimes itโs not the front-desk receipt clerk that steals. Surprisingly, your receipt supervisor can be on the take. So, consider that receipt theft takes place up-front and in the back-office.
Subscribe to 10 Days of Fraud Prevention
You'll receive my free 10-day course with examples of frauds and how to prevent them in your organization. You'll also receive my periodic newsletter. (You can unsubscribe at any time.)
Thanks for the encouragement Ronald. I appreciate your visiting.
Charles:
I always enjoy your articles and educational materials. thanks
Thanks Ross. I enjoy working with small businesses.
Like your audit comments for small audits.
Bill, Thanks for the comment. The cash-for-check substitute is deadly and one that most auditors are not aware of. Good job in catching this one. Here is a related post from a few weeks ago: https://cpahalltalk.com/fraud-check-for-cash-substitutions/
Great Points! Referencing revenue collection, I recommend a close study of revenue collection data links to the bank accounts reconcilation processes. I had a case were a manager after signing on as a cashier to help reduce long lines, pocket cash collections and and hide the resulting cash shortage by reducing the amount he posted for checks he had earlier intecertped from the mailroom and deposited while he was working as a cashier. This internal control step that would have stopped him was to have an independant reconcilation of checks deposted with checks collected. Take nothing for granted and do your own test.
Regards, Bill