Accounting tricks can inflate earnings.
One Wall Street Journal article said a California company used “a dozen or more accounting tricks” including “one particularly bold one: booking bogus sales to fake companies for products that didn’t exist.” These machinations inflated earnings, making the company look more profitable than it really was.
Today I show you how fraudsters use financial statement fraud to magically transform a company’s appearance. Then you will better know how to prevent these schemes.
Companies can magically create earnings by:
Think about it: A company can significantly increase its net income with just one journal entry at the end of the year. How easy is that?
You may be thinking, “But no one has stolen anything.” Yes, true, but the purpose of most revenue inflation tricks is to increase the company’s stock price. Once the price goes up, the company executives sell their stock and make their profits. Then the company can, in the subsequent period, reverse the prior period’s inflated entries.
Such chicanery usually flows from unethical owners, board members, or management. The “tone at the top” is not favorable. These types of accounting tricks usually don’t happen in a vacuum. Normally the top brass demands “higher profits,” often not dictating the particulars. (These demands are typically made in closed-door rooms with no recorders and no written notes.) Then years later, once the fraud is detected, those same leaders will plead ignorance saying their lieutenants worked alone.
The fix is transparency. This sounds too simple, but transparency will usually remove the temptation to inflate earnings. If you work for a company (or a boss) that is determined to “win at any cost,” and repeatedly hides things (“don’t tell anyone about what we’re doing”), it is time to look for another job. When people hide what they are doing, they know it is wrong–otherwise, why would they hide it?
A robust internal audit department can enhance transparency. The board should hire the internal auditors. Then these auditors should report directly to the board (not management). The company’s internal auditors should know that the board has their back. If not, then you’ll continue to have opaque reporting processes. Why? The internal auditors’ fear of reprisal from management (or the board itself).
And what if the leaders of an organization won’t allow transparency? If possible, remove them. Unethical leadership will destroy a business.
Also, use retrospective reviews of the receivable allowance account. By comparing current period allowances with the prior period, you might detect the intentional lowering of receivable allowance accounts. Why would a company do this? Lower allowances result in higher profits. It’s another form of financial statement fraud.
Get my free weekly accounting and auditing digest with the latest content.
Charles Hall is a practicing CPA and Certified Fraud Examiner. For the last thirty years, he has primarily audited governments, nonprofits, and small businesses. He is the author of The Little Book of Local Government Fraud Prevention and Preparation of Financial Statements & Compilation Engagements. He frequently speaks at continuing education events. Charles is the quality control partner for McNair, McLemore, Middlebrooks & Co. where he provides daily audit and accounting assistance to over 65 CPAs. In addition, he consults with other CPA firms, assisting them with auditing and accounting issues.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new window. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.